پرهیزگار، زکیه، علمالهدایی، حسن، و جباری نوقابی، مهدی. (1396). ظرفیت آموزش مسائل مدلسازی برای تغییر نگرش دانشآموزان نسبت به ریاضی. دو فصلنامة نظریه و عمل در برنامة درسی، 9(5)، 167-162.
پرهیزگار، زکیه. (1397). تأثیر آموزش مسائل مدلسازی ریاضی بر روی تجربههای جریان دانشآموزان در مسائل مختلف ریاضی. مقاله ارائه شده در شانزدهمین کنفرانس آموزش ریاضی، بابلسر.
رحیمپور، شکوفه، عارفی، مژگان و منشئی، غلامرضا (1398). اثربخشی ذهنآگاهی بر غرقگی و ثبات قدم دانشآموزان دختر دورة دوم متوسطه. مجلة مطالعات آموزش و یادگیری، 11(1)، 70-91.
عبداللهپور، کاظم، رفیعپور, ابوالفضل (1396). پدیدارشناسی چرخة مدلسازی دانشآموزان پایة نهم در حل یک مسئلة اصیل. فناوری آموزش، 11(3)، 237-248.
Abbott, J. A. (2000). “Blinking out” and “having the touch”: Two fifth-grade boys talk about flow experiences in writing. Written Communication, 17(1), 53–92.
Armstrong, A. C. (2008). The fragility of group flow: The experiences of two small groups in a middle school mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27, 101-115.
Asakawa, K. (2004). Fow experience and autotelic personality in japanese college students: how do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 123–154.
Azizi, Z., & Ghonsooly , B. (2015). Exploring flow theory in toefl texts: Expository and argumentative genre. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(1), 210-215.
Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser,W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning mathematical modelling (pp. 15 -30). New York: Springer.
Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, application, and links to other subjects-state, trends, and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37-68.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and Education. The NAMTA Journal, 22(2), 3-35.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1998). Finding flow: the psychology of flow experiences with everyday life (REP edition). New York: Basic Books
Custodero, L. A. (2002). Seeking challenge, finding skill: Flow experience and music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 103(3), 3–9.
Drakes, C. I. (2012). Mathematical Modelling: from Novice to Expert (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.
Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 87k(IV), 499–518.
English, L. D., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman & L. D. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 263-285). Advances in Mathematics Education, Series: Springer.
Galbraith P., & Clatworthy, N. (1990). Beyond standard models-meeting the challenge of modeling. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 137-163.
Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). Modelling for life: Mathematics and children’s experience. In W. Blum, W. Henne, & M. Niss (Eds.), Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education (ICMI Study 14, pp. 89–98). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J. B., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66 ,99–136.
Kahn, D. (2003). Montessori and optimal experience research: toward building a comprehensive education reform. The NAMTA Journal, 28(3), 1-10.
Kim, H. K., & Kim, S. (2010). The effects of mathematical modeling on creative production ability and self-directed learning attitude. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev, 11, 09–120.
Liljedahl, P. (2016). Flow: A Framework for Discussing Teaching. In Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 203-210). Szeged, Hungary.
Liljedahl, P. (2018). On the edges of flow: Student problem solving behavior. In S. Carreira, N.Amado, & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving: A focus on technology, creativity and affect (pp. 505–524). New York: Springer.
Liu, M., & Liljedahl, P. (2019). Flow and modelling. In Chamberlin, S. A. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Affect in Mathematical Modeling (pp. 273-295). Switzerland: Springer.
Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal For Research In Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47.
Mandigo, J. L., & Thompson, L. P. (1998). Go with their flow: How flow theory can help practitioners to intrinsically motivate children to be physically active. Physical Educator, 55(3), 145–160.
Mirlohi, M., Egbert, J., & Ghonsooly, B. (2011). Flow in translation Exploring optimal experience for translation trainees. Target, 23(2), 251–271.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Education (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. L. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 1 – 32). New York: Springer.
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Parhizgar, Z., & Liljedahl, P. (2019). Teaching Modelling Problems and its Effects on Students' Engagement and Attitude toward Mathematics. In Chamberlin, S. A. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Affect in Mathematical Modeling (pp. 235-25). Switzerland: Springer.
Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215–237.
Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2013). Planning, monitoring and multiple solutions while solving modelling problems. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proc. 37th Conf. of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 177-184). Kiel,Germany: PME.
Sedig, K. (2007). Toward operationalization of 'flow' in mathematics learnware. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2064-2092.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentimihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.
Skemp, R. R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics (2nd ed.). Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books.
Whitson, C. & Consoli, J. (2009). Flow Theory and Student Engagement. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 2(1), 40 – 49.
Winberg, T. M., & Hedman, l. (2008). Student attitudes toward learning, level of pre-knowledge and instruction type in a computer-simulation: effects on flow experiences and perceived learning outcomes. Instructional science, 36, 269–287.