بیابانگرد، اسماعیل. (1392). روشهای تحقیق در روانشناسی و علوم. دوران.
فردانش، هاشم. (1387). مبانی نظری تکنولوژی آموزشی. سمت.
کلارک، آر. سی. و مایر، آر. ای. (1393). یادگیری الکترونیکی و علم آموزش (ترجمة جواد حاتمی و کیومرث تقیپور). آوای نو.
Adcock, A. B., & Van Eck, R. N. (2005). Reliability and factor structure of the attitude toward tutoring agent scale (ATTAS). Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), 195-217.
Choi, S., & Clark, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent for learning English as a second language. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(4), 441-466.
Clark, R. E., & Choi, S. (2007). The questionable benefits of pedagogical agents: Response to Veletsianos. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 379-381.
Davis, R. O. (2017). The Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agent Gestures on Agent Social Acceptance and Learning Outcomes with Elementary School Foreign Language Students(Doctoral Dissertation). University of Florida.
Domagk, S. (2010). Do Pedagogical Agents Facilitate Learner Motivation and Learning Outcomes? Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22(2), 84-97. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000011
Ryu, J., & Ke, F. (2018). Increasing persona effects: Does it matter the voice and appearance of animated pedagogical agent. Educational Technology International, 19(1), 61-91.
Hall, B., & Henningsen, D. D. (2008). Social facilitation and human-computer interaction. Computers in human behavior, 24(6), 2965-2971. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb. 2013.02.023
Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(1), 47-78.
Johnson, A. M., Ozogul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2014). Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: moderating effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 91-115. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12078.
Kondracki, N. L., Wellman, N. S. & Amundson, D. R. (2002). Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 34(4), 224-230.
Hayashi, Y. (2019). Multiple pedagogical conversational agents to support learner-learner collaborative learning: Effects of splitting suggestion types. Cognitive Systems Research 54, 246-257, DOI: 10.1016/ j.cogsys.2018.04.005
Li, W., Wang, F., Mayer, R. E., & Liu, H. (2019). Getting the point: Which kinds of gestures by pedagogical agents improve multimedia learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1382. DOI: 10.1037/ edu0000352
Liew, T. W., Zin, N. A. M., & Sahari, N. (2017). Exploring the affective, motivational and cognitive effects of pedagogical agent enthusiasm in a multimedia learning environment. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 7(1), 1-21. DOI:10.1186/s13673-017-0089-2
Louwerse, M. M., Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Lu, S. (2009). Embodied conversational agents as conversational partners. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1244-1255.
Makransky, G., Wismer, P. & Mayer, R. E. (2018). A gender matching effect in learning with pedagogical agents in an immersive virtual reality science simulation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 349-358.
Mayer, R. E., & DaPra, C. S. (2012). An Embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 18(3), 239-252. DOI: 10.1037/a0028616.
Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 419-425. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.419
Meij, H., Meij, J., & Harmsen, R. (2015). Animated pedagogical agents effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 381-403. DOI:10.1007/s11423-015-9378-5.
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999-2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769-780. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020 .
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 598-610. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.598
Nam, C. S., Shu, J., & Chung, D. (2008). The roles of sensory modalities in collaborative virtual environments (CVEs). Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1404-1417.
Ozogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Atkinson, R. K., & Reisslein, M. (2013). Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions. Computers & Education, 67(0), 36-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2013.02.006
Roth, T., Appel, J., Schwingel, A., & Rumpler, M. (2019, May). Learning in virtual physics laboratories assisted by a pedagogical agent. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series(Vol. 1223, No. 1, p. 012001). IOP Publishing.Schroeder,
, & Adesope, O. O. (2012). A Case for the use of Pedagogical Agents in Online Learning Environments. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(2), 43 - 47.
Schroeder, N. L., Adesope, O. O., & Gilbert, R. B. (2013). How effective are Pedagogical Agents for Learning? A Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Computing Research, 49(1), 1-39.
Savin-Baden, M., Bhakta, R., Mason-Robbie, V., & Burden, D. (2019). An evaluation of the effectiveness of using pedagogical agents for teaching in inclusive ways. In Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive Education(pp. 117-134). Springer, Singapore. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4_7.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). Cambridge University Press.
)