نوآوری‌های آموزشی

نوآوری‌های آموزشی

بررسی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های جامعة یادگیری هیئت‌علمی (FLC)، طراحی مدل با روش آمیخته (مطالعة موردی: پردیس دانشگاه فرهنگیان استان تهران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
ساسان رستمی 1
محمد قهرمانی 2
محمود ابوالقاسمی 2
1 دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکدة علوم‌تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه علوم‌تربیتی، دانشکدة علوم‌تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
10.22034/jei.2024.295107.2015
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر که با هدف شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های جامعة یادگیری هیئت‌علمی به‌منظورِ ارائة مدل توسعة حرفه‌ای در دانشگاه انجام گرفته است ازنظرِ هدف کاربردی و ازنظرِ ماهیت داده‌ها آمیختة اکتشافی است. داده‌ها ازطریق مصاحبه و مشاهدات میدانی جمع‌آوری شد. در بخش کیفی پژوهش از نوع پدیدارشناسی است. مطالعات برحسبِ داده‌ها جمع‌آوری و با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و مصاحبة نیمه‌ساختاریافته بر روی 15نفر انجام شد. در بخش کمیِ مطالعات هم‌بستگی جامعة آماری پژوهش را اعضای هیئت‌علمی (موظف ‌ـ ‌غیرموظف) پردیس‌های دانشگاه فرهنگیان تهران (۵22 نفر) تشکیل دادند و با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای تعداد 220 نفر انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات در بخش کیفی مصاحبة نیمه‌ساختاریافته و در بخش کمّی پرسش‌نامة محقق‌ساخته بود. آلفای کرونباخ و روایی سازه ابزار اندازه‌گیری تعیین اعتبار بودند. در بخش کیفی از مقایسة مکرّر کدها و مشاورة خبرگان و در تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های کیفی از روش تحلیل مضمون و داده‌های کمی از شاخص‌های توصیفی، تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و برازش استفاده شد. ۴ بعد اصلی یافته‌های پژوهش در بخش کیفی عبارت‌اند از 1) اهداف و چشم‌انداز مشترک؛ 2) یادگیری جمع؛ 3) عمل حرفه‌ای مشترک؛ 4) بازتاب حرفه‌ای مشترک) و 9 بعد فرعی که مدل نهایی پژوهش بر اساس آن‌ها ارائه شد. در بخش کمی نتایج حاصل از آزمون یومان ویتنی نشان داد وضعیت موجود مؤلفه‌های جامعة یادگیری در بین استادان مطلوب نیست.  نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی حاکی از این بود که ابعاد برای پیش‌بینی جامعة یادگیری اعضای هیئت‌علمی بار علمی کافی دارند و شاخص‌‌های برازش الگوی تدوین‌شده از برازش مطلوبی برخوردارند. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
اعضای هیئت‌علمی
توسعة حرفه‌ای
جامعة یادگیری
دانشگاه فرهنگیان

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the dimensions and components of the faculty learning community, designing a model by mixed-methods (Case study: Campus of Farhangiān University of Tehran )

نویسندگان English

Sāsān Rostami 1
Mohammad Ghahramāni 2
Mahmoud Abolghāsemi 2
1 , PhD in Educational Management, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 (PhD), Associate Professor of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The current research, which was carried out with the aim of identifying the dimensions of the academic faculty learning community in order to provide a professional development model in the university, is applied in terms of purpose and exploratory mixed-methods in terms of the nature of data. In the qualitative section of the research, which was phenomenological in terms of the collected data, using a purposeful sampling method, 5 people were selected as sample. In the quantitative section of the study, the research population consisted of the faculty members (tenured and non-tenured) of Farhangiān University campuses in Tehran (522 people), from whom 220 people have been selected using stratified sampling method. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative section and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative section. Cronbach's alpha and construct validity were used to determine the validity of the measurement tool, and in the qualitative part, frequent comparison of codes and experts' advices were used. Qualitative data analysis has been done using thematic analysis and quantitative data analysis was done using descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices. Findings in the qualitative section of the study included 4 main dimensions (i.e., 1. common goals and vision, 2. collective learning, 3. common professional action, and 4. common professional reflection) and 9 sub-dimensions, based on which the final research model was presented. In the quantitative section of the study, the results of U Mann Whitney test showed that the current state of the components of the learning community among the professors is not desirable. Also, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis have shown that the dimensions have sufficient factor loadings to predict the learning community of academic staff members, and the fit indices of the model showed that the developed model has a good fit.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Faculty Members
Professional Development
Learning Community
University
  • نقی‌زاده، عشرت، فاطمه خیود، فاطمه صفری و سعید دلاور. (1397، 18 اردیبهشت). بررسی نقش دانشگاه فرهنگیان در بهبود کیفیت آموزش دورة ابتدایی [مقالة ارائه‌شده در کنفرانس]. سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های نوین در حوزة علوم‌تربیتی و روان‌شناسی و مطالعات اجتماعی ایران در تهران، تهران. ایران. https://civilica.com/l/8639/
  • إkerlind, G. S. (2005). Academic growth and development: How do university academics experience it? Higher Education, 50(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6345-1
  • Albulescu, I., & Albulescu, M. (2014). The university in the community. The university's contribution to local and regional development by providing educational services for adults. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.578
  • Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A. & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities (Report No. 637). DfES, GTCe, NCSL. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/5622/1/RR637.pdf
  • Bond, N. (2015). Developing a faculty learning community for non-tenure track professors. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 1-12. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1074179.pdf
  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://www.umces.edu/sites/default/files/al/pdfs/BoyerScholarshipReconsidered.pdf
  • Burress, T., Mann, E., & Neville, T. (2020). Exploring data literacy via a librarian-faculty learning community: A case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1), Article 102076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102076
  • Christie, J. (2016). Faculty Learning Communities to Support Technology Integration. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 9(1),1-19. https://journals.psu.edu/td/article/view/1063/523
  • Corrales, A., Goldberg, F., Price, E., & Turpen, C. (2020). Faculty persistence with research-based instructional strategies: a case study of participation in a faculty online learning communit. International Journal of STEM Education 7, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00221-8
  • Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. In M. D. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities (pp. 5 – 23). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.129
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
  • Daly, C. J. (2011). Faculty Learning Communities: Addressing the Professional Development Needs of Faculty and the Learning Needs of Student. currents in teaching and learning, 4(1), 3-14. https://www.worcester.edu/currents-in-teaching-and-learning/wp-content/uploads/sites/65/2022/05/Currents-Volume-04-Issue-01-Fall-2011.pdf#page=5
  • Dancy, M., Lau, A. C., Rundquist, A., & Henderson, C. (2019). Faculty online learning communities: A model for sustained teaching transformation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), Article 020147. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020147\
  • DuFour, R. (2004). Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8),6-11. https://static.battelleforkids.org/images/Shared/Schools%20as%20learning%20communities.pdf
  • Eisenberg, A. F., & Herman, A. P. (2008). Pedagogical partnerships: Faculty learning communities as a foundation for linking science and society. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Integrating the Sciences and Society: Challenges, Practices, and Potentials (Vol. 16, pp. 197-223). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-1152(08)16008-2
  • Engin, M., & Atkinson, F. (2015). Faculty Learning Communities: A Model for Supporting Curriculum Changes in Higher Education. International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 27(2), 164-174. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1082846.pdf
  • Falola, H. O., Adeniji, A., Adeyeye, J. O., Igbinnoba, E., & Atolagbe, T. O. (2020). Measuring institutional support strategies and faculty job effectiveness. Heliyon, 6(3), Article e03461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03461
  • Gaspar, S. (2010). Leadership and the professional learning community (Publication No. 3550587) [Doctoral dissertation, Nebraska University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/360f532bb62e73826712b0cb89af5777/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  • Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The Sustainability of Innovative Schools as Learning Organizations and Professional Learning Communities During Standardized Reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05278189
  • Hahn, T. B., & Lester, J. (2012). Faculty Needs and Preferences for Professional Development. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(2), 82–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23249101
  • Handzic, M., & Lagumdzija, S. (2010). Global faculty learning community: A case study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 8, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2009.35
  • Harbin, J. (2019). Innovating Together: Employing a Faculty Learning Community to Support Blended Learning (Publication No. 22622240) [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/ce1396782405181d18a23f8383b2df93/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  • Jackson, D. L., Stebleton, M. J., & Laanan, F. S. (2013). The Experience of Community College Faculty Involved in a Learning Community Program. Community College Review, 41(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552112473145
  • Marty-Pearson, J. (2012). Creation and implemention of a faculty learning community as a model for professional development: Addressing the needs of the general education faculty at a private junior college [Doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology]. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED551217
  • Moore, J. E., & Pinsky, M. R. (2015). Faculty development for fellows: Developing and evaluating a broad-based career development course for critical care medicine trainees. Journal of Critical Care, 30(5), 1152.e1-1152. e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.032
  • Mu, S., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2003). Developing Synergistic Knowledge in Student Groups. Journal of Higher Education, 74(6), 689–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11780864
  • Natkin, L. & Kolbe, T. (2016). Enhancing sustainability curriculum through faculty learning communities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(4), 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2015-0024
  • Nugent, J. S., Reardon, R. M., Smith, F. G., Rhodes, J. A., Zander, M. J., & Carter, T. J. (2008). Exploring faculty learning communities: Building connections among teaching, learning, and technology. International Journal of teaching and learning in Higher education, 20(1), 51-58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ895225.pdf
  • Peter, D. M. (2014). Improving community college faculty effectiveness through technology-based learning communities (Publication No. 3644921) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Walden]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/76b926c1a3bb5a0acdc8084935a6a3ed/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  • Roberts, S., & Pruitt, E. (2009). Schools as professional learning communities. Corwin Press.
  • Tahir, L. M., Said, M. N. H. M., Ali, M. F., Samah, N. A., Daud, K., & Mohtar, T. H. (2013). Examining the professional learning community practices: An empirical comparison from Malaysian universities clusters. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97(13), 105 – 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.210
  • Tinnell, T. L., Ralston, P. A., Tretter, T. R., & Mills, M. E. (2019). Sustaining pedagogical change via faculty learning community. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0180-5
  • Wicks, D. A., Craft, B. B., Mason, G. N., Gritter, K., & Bolding, K. (2015). An investigation into the community of inquiry of blended classrooms by a Faculty Learning Community. Internet and Higher Education, 25(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.001
  • Wilson, G. R. (2011). Trust or consequences: The relationship between faculity trust and faculity learning communities (Publication No. 3490225) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama at Birmingham] ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/18f76cde0739a09953fa14df547ab8c6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 مهر 1403