بابایی، سعیده، تقوی، مصطفی. (1394). نقدی بر نظریة انتقادی تکنولوژی. ذهن، 16(61)، 135-157.
https://zehn.iict.ac.ir/article_html
شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. (1390). مبانی نظری سند تحول بنیادین در نظام تعلیموتربیت رسمی و عمومی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. دبیرخانة شورای عالی وزارت آموزش و پرورش
کاجی، حسین. (1392). فلسفة تکنولوژی دون آیدی پاسخی به دترمینیسم تکنولوژیک. هرمس
مظفریپور، روحاله. (1400). روش پژوهش پساپدیدارشناسانه؛ پدیدارشناسی عملگرا. روششناسی علوم انسانی، 27(108)، 19-32.
https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2021.7391.2162
برومند، خشایار، و حسینی، حسن. (1394). رهایی از فضای تکنولوژیک حاکم در نظریة انتقادی تکنولوژی اندرو فینبرگ. حکمت و فلسفه، 11(41)، 28-7 .
https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_1576.html
Adams, C., & Thompson, T. L. (2016).
Researching a posthuman world: Interviews with digital objects. Palgrave Pivot.
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57162-5
Arzroomchilar, E. (2022). Some Suggestions to Improve Postphenomenology.
Human Studies, 45(1), 65-92.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09615-1
Bodén, L., Ceder, S., & Sauzet, S. (2021). Posthuman conceptions of change in empirical educational research.
Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 12(1).
https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/rerm/article/view/4215/3772
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge Polity Press
Feenberg, A. (1990). The critical theory of technology.
Capitalism Nature Socialism, 1(5), 17–45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759009358413
Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology (Vol. 5). Oxford University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2005). Critical theory of technology: An overview.
Tailoring Biotechnologies, 1(1), 47–64,
https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/books/critbio.pdf
Feenberg, A. (2014). Democratic rationalization: Technology, power and freedom. In R. C. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds),
Philosophy of Technology: The technological condition (pp. 706-719). Wily - Blackwell.
https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/demrat.pdf
Feenberg, A. (2015). Making the Gestalt Switch. In. R .Rosenberger & P. P Verbeek (Eds), Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations (pp. 229–37). Lexington Books.
Feenberg, A. (2020). Critical Constructivism, Postphenomenology and the Politics of Technology.
Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 24(1/2), 27-40.
https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2020210116
Feenberg, A. (2022). Critical Constructivism: An Exposition and Defense. In D. Cressman (Ed.),
The Necessity of Critique: Andrew Feenberg and the Philosophy of Technology (Vol. 41, pp. 15-38). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07877-4_2
Fron, J., Fullerton, T., Morie, J. F., & Pearce, C. (2007, September 24-28).
The hegemony of play [Conference presentation]. DiGRA 2007 – Digital Games Research Association International Conference: Situated Play, Tokyo, Japan.
http://www.digra.org/dl/db/07312.31224.pdf
Gertz, N. (2020). Democratic Potentialities and Toxic Actualities: Feenberg, Ihde, Arendt, and the Internet.
Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 24(1/2), 178-194.
https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2020214119
Ginn, F. (2017). Posthumanism. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu & R. A. Marston (Eds.),
International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0414
Given, L. M. (2008). Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage
Haggerson, N. L. (1991). Philosophical inquiry: Ampliative Criticism. Short, E. C. (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 43–60). State University of New York Press.
Hammar, E. (2013, October 2 - 4).
Post Phenomenological Play [Conference presentation]. The Philosophy of Computer Games 2013: Computer Game Space: Concept, Form and Experience - University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
https://gamephilosophy2013.w.uib.no/files/2013/09/Hammar_Postphenomenological-Play.pdf
Hauser, S., Oogjes, D., Wakkary, R., & Verbeek, P. P. (2018). An annotated portfolio on doing postphenomenology through research products. In
DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 459–471). Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196745
Ihde, D. (1978). Technics and praxis. Reidel Publishing Company
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking university lectures. Suny Press.
Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental Phenomenology Multistabilities. University of New York Press
Introna, L. D. (2017). Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology. In
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved September 10, 2021, From
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-it-phenomenology/
Jerusalimiec, L. D. (2018).
Technology, Hegemony, and Citizenship [Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University].
https://repository.library.carleton.ca/concern/etds/76537221z
Keymolen, E. (2021). In search of friction. A new postphenomenological lens to analyze human-smartphone interactions.
Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, Forthcoming.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690403
Kirkpatrick, G. (2020). Technical politics: Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology. Manchester University Press.
Romele, A. (2022). Is Critical Constructivism Critical Enough? Towards an Agonistic Philosophy of Technology. In Cressman, D. (Ed.),
The Necessity of Critique: Andrew Feenberg and the Philosophy of Technology (Vol. 41, pp. 239-253). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07877-4_13
Rosenberger, R. (2014). Multistability and the agency of mundane artifacts: From speed bumps to subway benches.
Human Studies, 37(3), 369-392.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9317-1
Rosenberger, R. (2017). Callous objects: Designs against the homeless. U of Minnesota Press.
Rosenberger, R. (2020a). On variational cross‐examination: A method for postphenomenological multistability. AI & Society, 38, 2229–2242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146‐020‐0105 1-14
Rosenberger, R. (2020b). But, That’s Not Phenomenology: A Phenomenology of Discriminatory Technologies.
Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 24(1/2), 83-113.
https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2020210117
Rosenberger, R. & Verbeek, P. P. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In R. Rosenbergerer & P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations: Postphenomenology and the Philosophy of Technology (pp. 9-41). Lexington Books.
Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. A. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. Routledge.
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time: The fault of Epimetheus (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Thompson, T. L., & Adams, C. (2020). Accountabilities of posthuman research.
Explorations in Media Ecology, 19(3), 337-349.
https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00050_7
Van Den Eede, Y. (2020). The Purpose of Theory: Why Critical Constructivism Should “Talk” and Postphenomenology Should “Do”.
Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 24(1&2), 114–37.
https://doi.org/10.5840/techne202027115
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2006). The morality of things. A postphenomenological inquiry. In E. Selinger (Ed.), Postphenomenology: a critical companion to Ihde (pp. 117-128). State University of New York Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2020). Politicizing postphenomenology. In G. Miller & A. Shew (Eds.),
Reimagining philosophy and technology, reinventing Ihde. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology (vol. 33, pp. 141–155). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35967-6_9
Verbeek, P. P. (2016). Toward a theory of technological mediation: a program for postphenomenological research. In J. K. B. O. Friis, & R. P. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and Postphenomenology: The Manhattan Papers (pp. 185-205). Lexington Books.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? (Vol. 8). U of Minnesota Press.
