Journal of Educational Innovations

Journal of Educational Innovations

The institution of education and reproduction of human capital in the path of human-centered development: A comparative analysis with the fsQCA approach in Iran, Japan, Finland and South Korea

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Azad University.Science and research branch
2 Faculty member of the Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University
3 Faculty member, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Science and Research Unit
Abstract
This study identifies necessary and sufficient conditions of education institutions for human capital reproduction and human-centered development. Using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), four countries were examined: Iran, Japan, Finland, and South Korea. The theoretical framework integrates institutional theory, capability approach, and human capital theory. Data were collected from educational policy documents, international reports (PISA, OECD, World Bank), and human development indicators (2010-2023), operationalized through fuzzy-set calibration. Nine variables were analyzed: teacher education quality, school autonomy, continuous assessment, technology integration, modern curriculum, international cooperation, educational investment, equity of access, and labor market alignment. Findings revealed three necessary conditions: teacher education quality (consistency=0.91), equity of access (consistency=0.88), and continuous assessment (consistency=0.85). Three sufficient configurations were identified: the Japanese model emphasizing high investment and strong teacher education (consistency=0.93); the Finnish model focusing on school autonomy and equity (consistency=0.89); and the South Korean model prioritizing technology and labor market alignment (consistency=0.87). Iran's analysis demonstrated that absence of continuous assessment, weak teacher education, and labor market misalignment constitute primary gaps. Iran shows significant deficits particularly in continuous assessment (0.28 vs. 0.85), teacher education (0.42 vs. 0.86), and labor market alignment (0.32 vs. 0.86). Results indicate multiple pathways can lead to human-centered development, contrary to linear models. The study provides policy recommendations at macro, meso, and micro levels for educational system reform.
Keywords
Subjects


Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 05 May 2026

  • Receive Date 02 February 2026
  • Revise Date 26 April 2026
  • Accept Date 05 May 2026