نوآوری‌های آموزشی

نوآوری‌های آموزشی

ارزیابی سواد آماری دانش‌آموزان پایۀ یازدهم ریاضی بر اساس طبقه‌بندی سولو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری آموزش ریاضی، گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی
2 دانشیار گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی
3 استادیار گروه آموزش و پرورش، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
4 دانشیار گروه آمار، دانشکده علوم ریاضی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
در عصر حاضر که داده‌ها در همۀ جنبه‌های زندگی نقش محوری دارند، سواد آماری به‌عنوان توانایی درک و کاربرد داده‌ها، به یک مهارت حیاتی برای همه، به ویژه دانش‌آموزان، تلقی می‌شود. هدف این پژوهش، ارزیابی سواد آماری دانش‌آموزان پایۀ یازدهم بود که به روش توصیفی-تحلیلی انجام شد. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش را دانش‌آموزان پایۀ یازدهم رشتۀ ریاضی- فیزیک منطقۀ یک تهران تشکیل می‌داد و نمونۀ پژوهش، ۴۵ دانش‌آموز دختر از یک دبیرستان بود که به صورت نمونۀ در دسترس انتخاب شدند. برای انجام این پژوهش، آزمونی با ده سوال، شامل مسائلی داده‌محور و مرتبط با همه‌گیری کووید-19، بر اساس دو محور اصلی «تحلیل داده‌ها» و «تفسیر نتایج» و بر مبنای مطالعات مرتبط در آموزش آمار، طراحی و اجرا شد. پاسخ‌های شرکت‌کنندگان در آزمون، بر پایۀ طبقه‌بندی تعدیل یافتۀ سولو که در پژوهش‌های آماری به‌کار برده می‌شود، تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که دانش‌آموزان، در محور تفسیر نتایج تحقیقات آماری با استفاده از داده‌های زندگی روزمره، عملکرد بهتری نسبت به محور تحلیل آنها داشتند. دلیل این امر را می‌توان به پیوند نزدیک داده‌های واقعی با تجربیات روزمرۀ دانش‌آموزان نسبت داد. اما محور تحلیل داده‌ها که شامل محاسبات پیچیده و شناسایی روابط بین متغیرها می‌شود، مهارت‌های تحلیلی پیشرفته‌تری را می‌طلبید که دانش‌آموزان در آن عملکرد پایین‌تری داشتند. نتایج این پژوهش می‌تواند توجه برنامه‌ریزان آموزشی و معلمان را برای استفادۀ بیشتر از مسائل زندگی واقعی در منابع آموزشی و تدریس آمار جلب کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of statistical literacy of eleventh-grade mathematics students based on the SOLO taxonomy

نویسندگان English

anahita Komeijani 1
Ebrahim Reyhani 2
Zahra Rahimi 3
Ehsan Bahrami Samani 4
1 PhD Candidate of Mathematics Education, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University
4 Associate Professor, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran,
چکیده English

In today's data-driven world, statistical literacy, defined as the ability to understand and apply data, has become an essential skill for everyone, particularly students. This research aimed to assess the statistical literacy of eleventh-grade students using a descriptive-analytical approach. The statistical population consisted of eleventh-grade students in the mathematics-Physics stream in Tehran's District One, with a sample of 45 female students from one high school selected through convenience sampling. For this study, a test comprising ten questions related to data-centric problems, specifically linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, was designed and administered focusing on two main axes: "Data Analysis" and "Interpretation of Results." The responses were analyzed using a modified SOLO taxonomy commonly used in statistical research. The results indicated that students performed better in interpreting statistical research results using everyday data compared to data analysis. This can be attributed to the close connection between real-life data and students' daily experiences. However, the data analysis axis, which involved complex calculations and identifying relationships between variables, required more advanced analytical skills, where students showed lower performance. This study's findings can draw educators' and curriculum planners' attention to integrating more real-life scenarios into educational resources and teaching statistics.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Statistics education
Eleventh grade students
statistical literacy
SOLO taxonomy
COVID-19 pandemic
زوارقی، رسول، قنبری، خدیجه، و عطاپور، هاشم. (1402) بررسی سطح سواد داده‌ای دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه تبریز و عوامل مؤثر بر آن ]پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تبریز[. ایرانداک.
حاتمی، علی. (1398). سواد آماری و فرهنگ عمومی نسبت به پیمایش. پژوهش‌های ارتباطی،  26(98)، 85-111.https://doi.10.22082/cr.2019.36449
رفیع‌پور، ابوالفضل. (1395، 4-2 شهریور). مدلسازی با دادههای دنیای واقعی به عنوان بخشی از سواد آماری ]مقاله ارائه شده در کنفرانس[. سیزدهمین کنفرانس آمار ایران، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران. https://elmnet.ir/doc/20742803-48622
Bidgood, P., Hunt, N., & Jolliffe, F. (Eds.). (2010). Assessment methods in statistical education: An international perspective. Wiley.
Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Goals, definitions, and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 3-16). The Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the observed learning outcome). Academic Press.
Budgett, S., & Rose, D. (2017). Developing statistical literacy in the final school year. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.221
Budgett, S., & Renelle, A. (2023). Statistical literacy – the golden rules: A review of Tim Harford’s The data detective: Ten easy rules to make sense of statistics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 20(1), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1612
Callingham, R., & Watson, J. M. (2005). Measuring statistical literacy. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(1), 19–47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8030840_Measuring_Statistical_Literacy
Chick, H. L., & Pierce, R. (2013). The statistical literacy needed to interpret school assessment data. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 15(2), 1–19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1018712.pdf
Earl, L. (2007). Assessment as learning. In W. D. Hawley (Ed.), Assessment as learning (2nd ed., pp. 85-98). Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329512
Fitzallen, N., Watson, J., & English, E. (2015). Assessing a statistical inquiry. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Wells (Eds.), Climbing mountains, building bridges (Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, July 13–18, Vol. 2, pp. 305–312). PME Program Committee.
Franklin, C., & Bargagliotti, A. (2020). Introducing GAISE II: A guideline for precollege statistics and data science education. Harvard Data Science Review, 2(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.246107bb
Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) Report: A Pre-K–12 curriculum framework. American Statistical Association. https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GAISEPreK-12_Full.pdf
Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x
Galesic, M., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2010). Statistical numeracy for health: A cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(5), 462-468. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.481
Garfield, J., Aliaga, M., Cobb, G., Cuff, C., Gould, R., Lock, R., Moore, T., Rossman, A., Stephenson, R., Utts, J., Velleman, P., & Witmer, J. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) project: College report. American Statistical Association. https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/gaise/gaiseprek-12_full.pdf
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00029.x
Garfield, J., & DelMas, R. (2010). A website that provides resources for assessing students’ statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking. Teaching Statistics, 32, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.2009.00373.x
Garfield, J., DelMas, R., & Chance, B. (2003, April 21–25). The web-based ARTIST: Assessment resource tools for improving statistical thinking project [Paper presentation]. AERA Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, United States. https://www.causeweb.org/cause/archive/artist/articles/AERA_2003.pdf
Giovannini, E. (2008). Understanding economic statistics: An OECD perspective. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2008/10/understanding-economic-statistics-an-oecd-perspective_g1gh9445.html
Jurečková, M., & Csachová, L. (2020). Statistical literacy of Slovak lower secondary school students. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 9(1), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v9i1.966
Hook, P., & Mills, J. (2011). SOLO Taxonomy: A guide for schools – A common language for learning book 1. Essential Resources Educational Publishers.
Jolliffe, F. (2007, August 19-21). The changing brave new world of statistics assessment [Paper presentation]. IASE/ISI Satellite Conference on Assessing Student Learning in Statistics, Guimarães, Portugal. https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/sat2007/Jolliffe.pdf
Jordan, E. W. (1981). Questioning strategies and sample problems for a course in statistical literacy. In Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Education (p. 103). The American Statistical Association. https://www.statlit.org/pdf/1981JordanASA.pdf
Kemp, M., & Lake, D. (2001). Choosing and using tables. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 57(3), 40-53.
Kaplan, J. J., & Thorpe, J. (2010). Post secondary and adult statistical literacy: Assessing beyond the classroom. Paper presented at the Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS8), Ljubljana, Slovenia. International Statistical Institute. https://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/icots8/ICOTS8_5E3_KAPLAN.pdf
Koleza, E., & Kontogianni, A. (2013, January). Assessing statistical literacy: What do freshmen know. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME8).  Ankara: Middle East Technical University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256909035_ASSESSING_STATISTICAL_LITERACY_WHAT_DO_FRESHMEN_KNOW
Kurnia, A. B., Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2024). The development of high school students’ statistical literacy across grade levels. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(Suppl 1), 7-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00449-x
Lehohla, P. (2002). Promoting statistical literacy: A South African perspective. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS-6), International Statistical Institute and International Association for statistics Education. Cape Town, South Africa.  [Online: https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/5d1_leho.pdf]
Lim, H. L., Wun, T. Y., & Chew, C. M. (2022). SOLO-based task to diagnose adult learners’ statistical literacy in the twenty-first century. In F. Yusop & A. Firdaus (Eds.), Alternative assessments in Malaysian higher education: Voices from the field (pp. 141-150). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7228-6_14
Reading, C. (2002). Profile for statistical understanding. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics: Developing a statistically literate society, Cape Town, South Africa. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/1a4_read.pdf?1402524960
Rossman, A., & Chance, B. (2002). A data-oriented, active learning, post-calculus introduction to statistical concepts, methods, and theory. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS-6), International Statistical Institute and International Association for statistics Education. Cape Town, South Africa.  http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/∼iase/publications/1/3i2_ross.pdf.
Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678
Sanchez, J., Forbes, S., Campos, P., Giacche, P., Townsend, M., Mooney, G., & Helenius, R. (2011). The millennium development goals, national statistical offices, the international statistical literacy project, and statistical literacy in schools. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 27(3-4), 157-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SJI-2011-0736
Schield, M. (2010). Assessing statistical literacy: Take care. In P. Bidgood, N. Hunt, & F. Jolliffe (Eds.), Assessment methods in statistical education: An international perspective (pp. 133–152). Wiley.
Sole, M. A. (2025). An investigation designed to teach statistical thinking in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: Are teens living like vampires? Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, (just-accepted), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2025.2455197
Walker, H. M. (1951). Statistical Literacy in the Social Sciences. The American Statistician5(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1951.10481912
Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical thinking using the media. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–122). IOS Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245508387_Assessing_Statistical_Thinking_Using_the_Media
Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3-46. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v2i2.553
Watson, J. M., Kelly, B. A., Callingham, R. A., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2003). The measurement of school students’ understanding of statistical variation. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 34(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390210000018791
Watson, J., & Fitzallen, N. (2010). The development of graph understanding in the mathematics curriculum. NSW Department of Education and Training. https://hdl.handle.net/102.100.100/504070
Watson, J., & Moritz, J. (2001). Development of reasoning associated with pictographs: Representing, interpreting, and predicting. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 47–81. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015594414565 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227326987_Development_of_reasoning_associated_with_pictographs_Representing_interpreting_and_predicting
Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Lawrence Erlbaum.        http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053898 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288309367_Statistical_Literacy_at_School_Growth_and_Goals
Watson, J. (2014). Curriculum expectations for teaching science and statistics. In B. de Sousa, R. Gould, & K. Makar (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 1–6). International Statistics Institute. https://iase-web.org/icots/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_1A1_WATSON.pdf
Watson, J., & Smith, C. (2022). Statistics education at a time of global disruption and crises: A growing challenge for the curriculum, classroom, and beyond. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-022-00167-7
Yilmaz, M. R. (1996). The challenge of teaching statistics to non-specialists. Journal of Statistics Education, 4(1), 1–9. http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v4n1/yilmaz.html

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 29 تیر 1404

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 02 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 تیر 1404